<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Belga</title>
	<atom:link href="http://koreanish.com/2009/04/30/belga/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://koreanish.com/2009/04/30/belga/</link>
	<description>Alexander Chee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: angelle</title>
		<link>http://koreanish.com/2009/04/30/belga/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[angelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://koreanish.com/?p=1183#comment-1892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[whoa.  so my feeder stopped feeding me your posts.  i was wondering what happened.

news is terrible yet fascinating.  it&#039;s impossible at times not to be sucked in, despite the knowledge that the media is never &quot;objective&quot; the way good journalism is &quot;supposed to be&quot;.  it&#039;s hard to stop.

when i&#039;m abroad i realize how much better cnn international is than the cnn we get at home.  i come home and wish somehow they would offer it as a special separate channel.  you know, just one little offering since they&#039;re already offering us 5 different types of mtvs and 4 spin-offs of discovery.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoa.  so my feeder stopped feeding me your posts.  i was wondering what happened.</p>
<p>news is terrible yet fascinating.  it&#8217;s impossible at times not to be sucked in, despite the knowledge that the media is never &#8220;objective&#8221; the way good journalism is &#8220;supposed to be&#8221;.  it&#8217;s hard to stop.</p>
<p>when i&#8217;m abroad i realize how much better cnn international is than the cnn we get at home.  i come home and wish somehow they would offer it as a special separate channel.  you know, just one little offering since they&#8217;re already offering us 5 different types of mtvs and 4 spin-offs of discovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenore</title>
		<link>http://koreanish.com/2009/04/30/belga/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lenore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://koreanish.com/?p=1183#comment-1884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a certain point in October, I think I followed your agent&#039;s advice. Being in Europe made me feel extra powerless to change things, for some reason. My compulsive nytimes.com tics started to wane.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a certain point in October, I think I followed your agent&#8217;s advice. Being in Europe made me feel extra powerless to change things, for some reason. My compulsive nytimes.com tics started to wane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Kokernak</title>
		<link>http://koreanish.com/2009/04/30/belga/#comment-1883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jane Kokernak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://koreanish.com/?p=1183#comment-1883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so glad that you made this observation about the press coverage of Michelle Obama, Carla Bruni, and Hillary Clinton&#039;s clothes and tied it to the Levi-Strauss quote. (Even the New Yorker published a short, admiring piece on the &quot;meaning&quot; of Michelle Obama&#039;s arms!)  I&#039;ve tried to say, in the company of intelligent people, that I am tired of the celebritizing of the Obamas -- to me, we should be observing the seriousness of their qualities, ethos, etc. This, apparently, makes me &quot;no fun.&quot;

Thank you for noticing this, for saying something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so glad that you made this observation about the press coverage of Michelle Obama, Carla Bruni, and Hillary Clinton&#8217;s clothes and tied it to the Levi-Strauss quote. (Even the New Yorker published a short, admiring piece on the &#8220;meaning&#8221; of Michelle Obama&#8217;s arms!)  I&#8217;ve tried to say, in the company of intelligent people, that I am tired of the celebritizing of the Obamas &#8212; to me, we should be observing the seriousness of their qualities, ethos, etc. This, apparently, makes me &#8220;no fun.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you for noticing this, for saying something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

